I never thought I would agree with the anti-feminists to this day. I just came across some news articles about wimbledon pay scales and now I wonder how relevant feminists are today and whether they do more harm than good at the end of the day.

I fail to see how paying the sharapovas and henins 4% more on an already staggering prize money of 625,000 can be beneficiary to the "women's movement". Uneducated girls remain uneducated, the rapes continue unchecked and the women that face the atrocities day in and day out have no means to escape it.

Wimbledon bows to women's call for pay equality

By Jonathan Brown
Published: 23 February 2007

Former Wimbledon champions queued up yesterday to pay tribute to the decision to offer equal prize money to both male and female winners of the Grand Slam tournament. Amélie Mauresmo, whose £625,000 prize cheque was £30,000 less than Roger Federer's last year, declared it a "victory for women in general". Maria Sharapova, who lifted the silver salver in 2004, said she was "thrilled". Three-times champion Venus Williams said the event would now be "even greater".

Day to Day, February 22, 2007 · The Wimbledon tennis tournament has announced
that it will begin paying female and male players the same amount for winning.
Wimbledon resisted making the pay equal for years, citing rules that require
more tennis play for men in order for them to win. Source: www.npr.org

All things not equal at Wimbledon Today's announcement of equal prize money for men and women at SW19 smacks of political correctness for political correctness' sake.
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/sport/2007/02/22/all_things_not_equal_at_wimble.html